Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05876
Original file (BC 2013 05876.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05876

					COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NOT INDICATED 



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His transfer of education benefits (TEB) approval be amended to 
reflect 1 Aug 11, rather than 16 May 13.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

After submitting his request for TEB, he was notified he did not 
have retainability and needed to submit a Statement of 
Understanding (SOU).  He submitted his promotion SOU.  He later 
found out that a TEB request required a different SOU.

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force 9 Mar 93.  

On 16 Nov 11, the applicant entered into a 26 month extension to 
qualify for TEB.  His new date of separation (DOS) was 
established as 7 Nov 15.  Had the applicant transferred his 
benefits on 1 Aug 11 as he requests, he would have incurred an 
active duty service commitment (ADSC) of four years and been 
required to serve until 31 Jul 15.  

On 6 Jun 13, the applicant entered into his second extension for 
25 months to qualify for TEB.  His new date of separation was 
established as 7 Mar 17.  

On 3 Feb 14, the applicant submitted an application for 
retirement with an effective date of 1 Jun 14.

On 3 Feb 14, the applicant’s commander requested a waiver for 
the applicant’s ADSC for TEB noting the applicant’s Air Force 
Specialty Code (AFSC) 8F000 was currently manned at 100 percent, 
his original AFSC 3E0X1 was over manned, and the last ADSC was 
accomplished at the direction of the Air Force Personnel Center 
(AFPC).  

On 1 Jun 14, the applicant retired and was credited with 21 
years, 2 months, and 22 days of active service.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.    


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of 
an error or injustice.  The applicant did not meet the 
eligibility requirements as prescribed by law.  The applicant’s 
first TEB application clearly stated the service member must use 
the vMPF to complete the TEB SOU.  It also stated if the service 
member did not meet the retainability requirements and failed to 
sign the TEB SOU within 14 days, the application would be 
rejected.  The applicant failed to complete both actions within 
the required time period.  He reapplied on 26 Oct 11 and again 
failed to secure retainability and sign the TEB SOU within 14 
day period.  He was provided a TEB extension until 16 Nov 11; 
however, he failed to sign the TEB SOU.

Service members, who apply for TEB through the MilConnect 
website, are forwarded a message that states the transfer 
request is not final until the AF Form 4406, Post-9/11 GI Bill 
Transfer of Educational Benefits Statement of Understanding, is 
digitally signed in vMPF.  Within 72 duty hours, the service 
member will receive an email from the AFPC stating their AF Form 
4406 is ready for signature.  The service member is instructed 
to call the Total Force Service Center (TFSC) if they did not 
receive the email.  The applicant did not inquire about his TEB 
requests until 22 Mar 13.  He was officially approved for TEB on 
16 May 13.  If the applicant fulfills his active duty service 
commitment (27 Feb 17), he will retain the TEB benefits.   

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIT evaluation, with attachments, 
is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 20 May 14 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion 
the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-05876 in Executive Session on 8 Dec 14 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	 , Panel Chair
	 , Member
	 , Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 9 Dec 13.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 8 Jan 14,
                 w/atchs.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 May 14.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04298

    Original file (BC 2013 04298.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04928 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill Education Benefits (TEB) to his dependents on 17 Aug 11. He should be granted the 17 Aug 11 TEB transfer date because he met the requirements by signing the AF Form 4406, Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Educational Benefits Statement of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04771

    Original file (BC 2013 04771.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 Bill, has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election, and agrees to serve a specified additional period in the Armed Forces from the date of election (if applicable), may transfer unused Post-9/11 benefits to their dependents pursuant to Service regulations (Title 38 USC, Chapter 33, § 3319(b)(1)). If you do not receive...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03459

    Original file (BC 2014 03459.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The message states in part: "Within 72 hours you will receive an Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) email with "TEB INCIDENT" in the subject line, stating that your AF Form 4406 is ready for signature. The date on the SOU provided by the applicant reads “9/6/2011”. The applicant did not complete the TEB SOU and therefore his 20 May 11 TEB application could not be approved.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04592

    Original file (BC 2013 04592.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04592 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His active duty service commitment (ADSC) for his Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) be changed to 21 Apr 11, instead of 30 Apr 15. On 20 May 13, more than two years after extending his enlistment for TEB, AFPC notified him that the TEB transfer did not occur because he did not sign the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02736

    Original file (BC 2014 02736.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence the applicant signed the SOU in March 11. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02875

    Original file (BC 2013 02875.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Post-9/11 GI Bill TEB requires: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and: * Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05847

    Original file (BC 2013 05847.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He obtained the necessary retainability, his intentions were documented on his AF Form 901 and the fact the MilConnect and VMPF does not reflect that he qualified for the TEB, on 13 Sep 11, reflects a clear disservice to him. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s complete submission, the Board majority recommends approval. We note AFPC/DPSIT states there is no evidence the applicant applied for the TEB in MILCONNECT or signed the SOU.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03671

    Original file (BC 2013 03671.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03671 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The effective date of his Post-9/11 Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) election and his associated four-year active duty service commitment (ADSC) begin on 16 Mar 10. Had the applicant completed his election to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03407

    Original file (BC 2014 03407.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03407 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Post 9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) be approved. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03131

    Original file (BC 2014 03131.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no record the member signed his SOU on 18 Feb 10. DPSIT recommends the member’s date of TEB application be changed to 18 Feb 10 and the ADSC date be adjusted to 17 Feb 11, due to the fact that he did not receive emails instructing him to sign the SOU. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-03131 in Executive Session on 11 May 15 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member All members voted to correct the records as recommended.